Langford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Langford v. State

108 So. 3d 720, 2013 WL 756344, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3298

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 1, 2013

DocketNo. 5D12-4185

StatusPublished

This text of 108 So. 3d 720 (Langford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langford v. State, 108 So. 3d 720, 2013 WL 756344, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3298 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William B. Langford, appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order denying Langford’s scoresheet error claim without comment. However, the trial court failed to address Langford’s other claim that he is being illegally detained for violating probation, as he claims that probation was not part of the sentence imposed at his 2004 resentencing hearing. The State concedes the record attachments do not demonstrate that probation was ordered. On remand, the trial court shall attach the record refuting Langford’s claim.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

PALMER, COHEN, and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, William B. Langford, appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a). We affirm the trial court’s order denying Langford’s scoresheet error claim without comment. However, the trial court failed to address Langford’s other claim that he is being illegally detained for violating probation, as he claims that probation was not part of the sentence imposed at his 2004 resentencing hearing. The State concedes the record attachments do not demonstrate that probation was ordered. On remand, the trial court shall attach the record refuting Langford’s claim.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

PALMER, COHEN, and JACOBUS, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

108 So. 3d 720, 2013 WL 756344, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 3298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langford-v-state-fladistctapp-2013.