Langford v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Langford v. State

773 So. 2d 108, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16339, 2000 WL 1836780

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 15, 2000

DocketNo. 5D99-3098

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 773 So. 2d 108 (Langford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langford v. State, 773 So. 2d 108, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16339, 2000 WL 1836780 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal,¹ the state has acknowledged that Langford received a sentence for aggravated battery,² which exceeded both the statutory maximum and the recommended guidelines range. It is therefore illegal. See, e.g., Eckard v. State, 758 So.2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse Langford’s sen[109]*109tence of twelve years incarceration followed by ten years probation and remand for resentencing.

Sentence VACATED; REMANDED.

COBB, W. SHARP, and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this Anders appeal,¹ the state has acknowledged that Langford received a sentence for aggravated battery,² which exceeded both the statutory maximum and the recommended guidelines range. It is therefore illegal. See, e.g., Eckard v. State, 758 So.2d 742 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000). Accordingly, we reverse Langford’s sen[109]*109tence of twelve years incarceration followed by ten years probation and remand for resentencing.

Sentence VACATED; REMANDED.

COBB, W. SHARP, and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

773 So. 2d 108, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16339, 2000 WL 1836780, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langford-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack