Langford v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Langford v. State

103 So. 313, 89 Fla. 100

DecidedFebruary 14, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 103 So. 313 (Langford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langford v. State, 103 So. 313, 89 Fla. 100 (Fla. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

J. M. Langford took writ of error to a judgment convicting him of larceny of one red steer. The *101 testimony is of such a nature that the court is of the opinion that justice will be subserved by granting a new trial. Moore v. State, 81 Fla. 642, 88 South. Rep. 320.

Reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

J. M. Langford took writ of error to a judgment convicting him of larceny of one red steer. The *101 testimony is of such a nature that the court is of the opinion that justice will be subserved by granting a new trial. Moore v. State, 81 Fla. 642, 88 South. Rep. 320.

Reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

103 So. 313, 89 Fla. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langford-v-state-fla-1925.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack