Langford v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Langford v. State

103 So. 313, 89 Fla. 100

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 14, 1925·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

J. M. Langford took writ of error to a judgment convicting him of larceny of one red steer. The *101 testimony is of such a nature that the court is of the opinion that justice will be subserved by granting a new trial. Moore v. State, 81 Fla. 642, 88 South. Rep. 320.

Reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

J. M. Langford took writ of error to a judgment convicting him of larceny of one red steer. The *101 testimony is of such a nature that the court is of the opinion that justice will be subserved by granting a new trial. Moore v. State, 81 Fla. 642, 88 South. Rep. 320.

Reversed.

Taylor, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Browne, West and Terrell, J. J., concur.

Langford v. State, 103 So. 313, 89 Fla. 100 (Fla. 1925).

Pincite

103 So. 313 (Langford v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related