Langford v. State

860 S.W.2d 271, 314 Ark. 151, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 494
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedSeptember 13, 1993
DocketCR 92-795
StatusPublished

This text of 860 S.W.2d 271 (Langford v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langford v. State, 860 S.W.2d 271, 314 Ark. 151, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 494 (Ark. 1993).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner, Samuel Langford, by his attorney, Vandell Bland, Sr., has filed a motion for rule on the clerk. His attorney admits that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See Terry v. State, 272 Ark. 243, 613 S.W.2d 90 (1981); In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct. In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)
Terry v. State
613 S.W.2d 90 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
860 S.W.2d 271, 314 Ark. 151, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langford-v-state-ark-1993.