Langford v. Salter

90 S.E. 860, 146 Ga. 123, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 618
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 16, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 90 S.E. 860 (Langford v. Salter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langford v. Salter, 90 S.E. 860, 146 Ga. 123, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 618 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Where counsel acknowledges service upon a bill of exceptions, such acknowledgment shall be held to be a complete waiver of all defects in the service which the counsel signing it is legally competent to waive, unless counsel in the entry of acknowledgment distinctly and specifically states that it is not to be construed as waiving some particular defect then pointed out by him. Acts 1911, p. 150, sec. 4. The ruling in Inman v. Estes, 104 Ga. 645 (30 S. E. 800), is superseded by the act just cited. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is therefore overruled.

2. The allegations in the petition are sufficient to set out a continuing trespass; and therefore the court'erred in sustaining the general demurrer. Martin v. Pattillo, 126 Ga. 436 (55 S. E. 240).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carnes v. Pittman
74 S.E.2d 852 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Majette v. Strickland
118 S.E. 477 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 860, 146 Ga. 123, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langford-v-salter-ga-1916.