Langford v. Salter

90 S.E. 860, 146 Ga. 123, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 618
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 16, 1916·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. Where counsel acknowledges service upon a bill of exceptions, such acknowledgment shall be held to be a complete waiver of all defects in the service which the counsel signing it is legally competent to waive, unless counsel in the entry of acknowledgment distinctly and specifically states that it is not to be construed as waiving some particular defect then pointed out by him. Acts 1911, p. 150, sec. 4. The ruling in Inman v. Estes, 104 Ga. 645 (30 S. E. 800), is superseded by the act just cited. The motion to dismiss the bill of exceptions is therefore overruled.

2. The allegations in the petition are sufficient to set out a continuing trespass; and therefore the court'erred in sustaining the general demurrer. Martin v. Pattillo, 126 Ga. 436 (55 S. E. 240).

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langford v. Salter, 90 S.E. 860, 146 Ga. 123, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 618 (Ga. 1916).

90 S.E. 860 (Langford v. Salter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carnes v. Pittman
74 S.E.2d 852 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Majette v. Strickland
118 S.E. 477 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1923)