Langford v. Jewett Transportation Service

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Langford v. Jewett Transportation Service

271 A.D.2d 412, 706 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3816

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 3, 2000·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated August 16, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment, the defendants submitted, inter alia, magnetic resonance imaging and computerized axial tomography scan reports of the plaintiff Anita Conte Langford’s lumbar spine approximately one month and three months after the subject accident. These reports revealed the existence of several bulging discs in her spine. Accordingly, the defendants failed to establish a prima facie case that the plaintiff Anita Conte Langford’s injuries were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Faruque v Ponce, 259 AD2d 464; Rosmarin v Lamontanaro, 238 AD2d 567; Mariaca-Olmos v Mizrhy, 226 AD2d 437). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Sangiorgio, J.), dated August 16, 1999, which denied their motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In support of their motion for summary judgment, the defendants submitted, inter alia, magnetic resonance imaging and computerized axial tomography scan reports of the plaintiff Anita Conte Langford’s lumbar spine approximately one month and three months after the subject accident. These reports revealed the existence of several bulging discs in her spine. Accordingly, the defendants failed to establish a prima facie case that the plaintiff Anita Conte Langford’s injuries were not serious within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Faruque v Ponce, 259 AD2d 464; Rosmarin v Lamontanaro, 238 AD2d 567; Mariaca-Olmos v Mizrhy, 226 AD2d 437). Mangano, P. J., Santucci, Krausman, Florio and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Langford v. Jewett Transportation Service, 271 A.D.2d 412, 706 N.Y.S.2d 435, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

271 A.D.2d 412 (Langford v. Jewett Transportation Service) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related