Langford (Justin) Vs. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 24, 2020·No. 80926·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JUSTIN ODELL LANGFORD, No. 80926 Appellant,

vs.

THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a rnotion to compel production of court records. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph Hardy, Jr., Judge.

This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect.

Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order granting a motion to compel production of court records. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre

J.

Hardesty Cadish

cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge Justin Odell Langford Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 4V.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langford (Justin) Vs. State, (Neb. 2020).

Langford (Justin) Vs. State (Langford (Justin) Vs. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)