Langford (Justin) Vs. State
This text of Langford (Justin) Vs. State (Langford (Justin) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
JUSTIN ODELL LANGFORD, No. 80926 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting a rnotion to compel production of court records. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Joseph Hardy, Jr., Judge. This court's review of this appeal reveals a jurisdictional defect. Specifically, no statute or court rule provides for an appeal from an order granting a motion to compel production of court records. See Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 792 P.2d 1133 (1990) (right to appeal is statutory; where no statute or court rule provides for an appeal, no right to appeal exists). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.
Parraguirre
J. Hardesty Cadish cc: Hon. Joseph Hardy, Jr., District Judge Justin Odell Langford Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk
SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A 4V. 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Langford (Justin) Vs. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langford-justin-vs-state-nev-2020.