Langfield v. Cozine

124 So. 14, 98 Fla. 565
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 3, 1929
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 124 So. 14 (Langfield v. Cozine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langfield v. Cozine, 124 So. 14, 98 Fla. 565 (Fla. 1929).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion to quash the appeal herein is granted on the authority of Randall v. Twitchell and Langfield, et al., v. Cozine, decided at this term.

Terrell, C. J., and Whitfield, Ellis, Strum, Brown and Buford, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lane v. State
19 So. 2d 366 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)
Williams v. City of Fernandina
189 So. 830 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Glass v. Layton
192 So. 330 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1937)
Blanton v. Woodward, Admr.
144 So. 300 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 So. 14, 98 Fla. 565, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langfield-v-cozine-fla-1929.