Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. v. United States

52 Cust. Ct. 262, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3769

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 1964

DocketNo. 68304; protests-62/5246, 62/5247, and 62/5248 (Seattle)

StatusPublished

This text of 52 Cust. Ct. 262 (Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. v. United States, 52 Cust. Ct. 262, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3769 (cusc 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

[263]*263Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

items marked “A” consist of bead strings similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. S. H. Kress & Co. (46 CCPA 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim at 15% percent under the provision in said paragraph 1503, as modified by T.D. 54108, for beads, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “G,” stipulated to consist of glass balls similar in all material respects to those the subject of Joseph Markovits, Inc. v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 151, C.D. 2216), were held properly dutiable at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 218(f), as modified by T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877, for colored glass articles, valued not over $1.66% each, as claimed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[263]*263Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

items marked “A” consist of bead strings similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. S. H. Kress & Co. (46 CCPA 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim at 15% percent under the provision in said paragraph 1503, as modified by T.D. 54108, for beads, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “G,” stipulated to consist of glass balls similar in all material respects to those the subject of Joseph Markovits, Inc. v. United States (45 Cust. Ct. 151, C.D. 2216), were held properly dutiable at 30 percent under the provision in paragraph 218(f), as modified by T.D. 53865 and T.D. 53877, for colored glass articles, valued not over $1.66% each, as claimed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 Cust. Ct. 262, 1964 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 3769, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langfelder-homma-carroll-inc-v-united-states-cusc-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack