Langevin v. First Union National Bank

60 So. 3d 426, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2698, 2011 WL 722603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 3, 2011·No. No. 1D10-4308·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this workers’ compensation case, Claimant appeals from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) denying permanent total disability benefits. Although the JCC erred in finding the claim was barred by the doctrines of res judicata and law of the case, we nevertheless affirm the order on the merits because the JCC properly found Claimant failed to satisfy the five-step sequential inquiry used to establish catastrophic injury under section 440.15(l)(b), Florida Statutes. See, e.g., Butler v. City of Jacksonville, 980 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla. 1st DCA 2008).

AFFIRMED.

KAHN, THOMAS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langevin v. First Union National Bank, 60 So. 3d 426, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2698, 2011 WL 722603 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

60 So. 3d 426 (Langevin v. First Union National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butler v. City of Jacksonville
980 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)