Langermann v. Harris

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: March 5, 2018
• Docket: 75069
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

ROBERT LANGERMANN, No. 75069 Appellant, vs. RICHARD A. HARRIS, INDIVIDUALLY AND D/B/A RICHARD HARRIS LAW FIRM, A NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP; AND RICHARD A. HARRIS, P.C., A NEVADA PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION, Respondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order granting in part a motion to dismiss and denying a motion to amend complaint. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Susan Johnson, Judge. Our review of the notice of appeal and documents transmitted with that notice reveals a jurisdictional defect. The challenged order is not appealable as a final judgment under NRAP 3A(b)(1) because appellant's claims for breach of contract, negligence, conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, and negligent supervision remain pending in the district court. See Lee u. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment as one that disposes of all issues presented and leaves nothing for the court's future consideration except for post-judgment issues such as attorney fees and costs). As no other statute or court rule appears to authorize an appeal from the challenged order, see Brown v. MHO Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. SUPREME COURT OF

i z- orfk 7 NEVADA

10) 1947A a 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (explaining that this court has jurisdiction to consider an appeal only when the appeal is authorized by statute or court rule), we conclude that we lack jurisdiction and we ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.

Cherry

Al4C4-0 Parraguirre Stiglich

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Robert Langermann Richard Harris Law Firm Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 2 (01 1947A ea Tri