Langerman v. Langerman

278 A.D. 933, 106 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272

This text of 278 A.D. 933 (Langerman v. Langerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langerman v. Langerman, 278 A.D. 933, 106 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Opinion

Order affirmed, without costs. Ho opinion. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.; Yan Yoorhis, J., concurs to affirm in the following memo: Regardless of any other question, this action is not maintainable in the right of the infant plaintiffs by their guardian ad litem, at least in the absence of a demand upon the mother, having their custody, and a refusal upon her part to institute the action for their benefit (Kendall v. Kendall, 200 App. Div. 702; Yates v. Yates, 183 Misc. 934). Order dismissing the complaint affirmed but without prejudice to the prosecution of whatever right of action, if any, may inhere in the mother. Dore, J. P., and Shientag, J., dissent and vote to reverse and deny the motion to dismiss the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kendall v. Kendall
200 A.D. 702 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1922)
Yates v. Yates
183 Misc. 934 (New York Supreme Court, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
278 A.D. 933, 106 N.Y.S.2d 607, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langerman-v-langerman-nyappdiv-1951.