Langer v. Owen-Morgan, Inc.

278 A.D. 552, 102 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3864
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 16, 1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The procedure adopted in this case was erroneous, and the clerk should not have accepted the amended note of issue to place the case on the jury calendar, but plaintiff should have applied to the court for relief under subdivision 5 of section 426 of the Civil Practice Act. However, in view of the short period of time that elapsed, we consider the application as one made under that section. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondent. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and

Shientag, JJ. [See post, p. 654.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langer v. Owen-Morgan, Inc., 278 A.D. 552, 102 N.Y.S.2d 433, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3864 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

278 A.D. 552 (Langer v. Owen-Morgan, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leahy v. Delvee Realty Corp.
208 Misc. 57 (New York Supreme Court, 1955)