Langer v. Murray

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Langer v. Murray

123 N.Y.S. 165

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMay 24, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 123 N.Y.S. 165 (Langer v. Murray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langer v. Murray, 123 N.Y.S. 165 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

LEHMAN, J.

The plaintiff has brought an action for goods sold and delivered. According to the return the trial justice rendered— “judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, with $30, costs. Counterclaim dismissed, with $15 costs.”

The defendant has admitted the receipt of at least a portion of the goods, and it is not seriously disputed that the plaintiff was entitled to a judgment on his cause of action. The defendant claims, however, that the trial justice found in his favor on the counterclaim, and offsét the judgment on the counterclaim against the sum allowed to plaintiff on his cause of action. We need not consider whether in any event a judgment for defendant on the counterclaim could be sustained, because the return fails to show such a judgment, and we cannot go beyond the return.

Judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs ' to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LEHMAN, J.

The plaintiff has brought an action for goods sold and delivered. According to the return the trial justice rendered— “judgment in favor of the defendant and against the plaintiff, with $30, costs. Counterclaim dismissed, with $15 costs.”

The defendant has admitted the receipt of at least a portion of the goods, and it is not seriously disputed that the plaintiff was entitled to a judgment on his cause of action. The defendant claims, however, that the trial justice found in his favor on the counterclaim, and offsét the judgment on the counterclaim against the sum allowed to plaintiff on his cause of action. We need not consider whether in any event a judgment for defendant on the counterclaim could be sustained, because the return fails to show such a judgment, and we cannot go beyond the return.

Judgment should be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs ' to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

123 N.Y.S. 165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langer-v-murray-nyappterm-1910.