Langer v. Garay

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Langer v. Garay

37 A.D.2d 545, 322 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3791

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 37 A.D.2d 545 (Langer v. Garay) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langer v. Garay, 37 A.D.2d 545, 322 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3791 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 25, 1970, granting plaintiff’s motion to examine three witnesses before trial, to the extent of directing an examination of only one of them, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of further granting plaintiff’s motion insofar as it seeks to examine witness, Papoutsis,. in addition to Mpugias, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The same special circumstances which were found by Special Term to be sufficient to justify an examination before trial of Mougias, warrant'an examination of his partner, Papoutsis. The eonclusory denial of wrongdoing, contained in the latter’s affidavit, which was submitted in opposition to plaintiff’s motion, is an insufficient substitute for a pretrial deposition. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, MeGivern, Markewich and Tilzer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on November 25, 1970, granting plaintiff’s motion to examine three witnesses before trial, to the extent of directing an examination of only one of them, unanimously modified, on the law and on the facts, to the extent of further granting plaintiff’s motion insofar as it seeks to examine witness, Papoutsis,. in addition to Mpugias, and otherwise affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The same special circumstances which were found by Special Term to be sufficient to justify an examination before trial of Mougias, warrant'an examination of his partner, Papoutsis. The eonclusory denial of wrongdoing, contained in the latter’s affidavit, which was submitted in opposition to plaintiff’s motion, is an insufficient substitute for a pretrial deposition. Concur—Stevens, P. J., Capozzoli, MeGivern, Markewich and Tilzer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 A.D.2d 545, 322 N.Y.S.2d 995, 1971 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langer-v-garay-nyappdiv-1971.