Langenour v. French

34 Cal. 92
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1867
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 34 Cal. 92 (Langenour v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langenour v. French, 34 Cal. 92 (Cal. 1867).

Opinions

By the Court, Sawyer, J.:

Although the language used is not very exact or apt, wre think the petition substantially shows the jurisdictional facts. So, also, the order made by the Judge might in some respects have been better expressed; yet, the effect is, to combine an order for meeting of the creditors with an order to publish the notice. It necessarily imports that the creditors are required to meet on the day they are to be notified [98]*98to meet. Jurisdiction having been obtained, we do not think the evidence discloses facts sufficient to vitiate the judgment discharging the insolvent.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

England v. Moore Equipment Co.
94 F. Supp. 532 (N.D. California, 1950)
Haub v. Tuttle
251 P. 925 (California Court of Appeal, 1926)
Edwards v. Sweigert
115 P. 256 (California Court of Appeal, 1911)
Primm v. Superior Court
84 P. 786 (California Court of Appeal, 1906)
Ohleyer v. Bunce
4 P. 549 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
Read v. Rahm
4 P. 111 (California Supreme Court, 1884)
Day v. Superior Court
61 Cal. 489 (California Supreme Court, 1882)
Flint v. Wilson
36 Cal. 24 (California Supreme Court, 1868)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Cal. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langenour-v-french-cal-1867.