Langenour v. French
This text of 34 Cal. 92 (Langenour v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Although the language used is not very exact or apt, wre think the petition substantially shows the jurisdictional facts. So, also, the order made by the Judge might in some respects have been better expressed; yet, the effect is, to combine an order for meeting of the creditors with an order to publish the notice. It necessarily imports that the creditors are required to meet on the day they are to be notified [98]*98to meet. Jurisdiction having been obtained, we do not think the evidence discloses facts sufficient to vitiate the judgment discharging the insolvent.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 Cal. 92, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langenour-v-french-cal-1867.