Langenhorst v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Illinois Supreme Court

Langenhorst v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

796 N.E.2d 1053, 205 Ill. 2d 586, 277 Ill. Dec. 687, 2003 Ill. LEXIS 1440

CourtIllinois Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 7, 2003

Docket94836

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 796 N.E.2d 1053 (Langenhorst v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langenhorst v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, 796 N.E.2d 1053, 205 Ill. 2d 586, 277 Ill. Dec. 687, 2003 Ill. LEXIS 1440 (Ill. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

796 N.E.2d 1053 (2003) 205 Ill.2d 586 277 Ill.Dec. 687

Rita LANGENHORST, etc., respondent,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, etc., et al., petitioners.

No. 94836.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

October 7, 2003.

In the exercise of this Court's supervisory authority, the Appellate Court, Fifth District, is directed to vacate its judgment in Langenhorst v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. et al., case No. 5-02-0459. The appellate court is directed to reconsider its judgment in light of Dawdy v. Union Pacific R.R. Co. et al., case No. 93710, 207 Ill.2d 167, 278 Ill.Dec. 92, 797 N.E.2d 687, 2003 WL 21983273 (08/21/03), and First American Bank v. Guerine, 198 Ill.2d 511, 261 Ill.Dec. 763, 764 N.E.2d 54 (2002).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

796 N.E.2d 1053 (2003) 205 Ill.2d 586 277 Ill.Dec. 687

Rita LANGENHORST, etc., respondent,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, etc., et al., petitioners.

No. 94836.

Supreme Court of Illinois.

October 7, 2003.

In the exercise of this Court's supervisory authority, the Appellate Court, Fifth District, is directed to vacate its judgment in Langenhorst v. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. et al., case No. 5-02-0459. The appellate court is directed to reconsider its judgment in light of Dawdy v. Union Pacific R.R. Co. et al., case No. 93710, 207 Ill.2d 167, 278 Ill.Dec. 92, 797 N.E.2d 687, 2003 WL 21983273 (08/21/03), and First American Bank v. Guerine, 198 Ill.2d 511, 261 Ill.Dec. 763, 764 N.E.2d 54 (2002).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

796 N.E.2d 1053, 205 Ill. 2d 586, 277 Ill. Dec. 687, 2003 Ill. LEXIS 1440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langenhorst-v-norfolk-southern-railway-company-ill-2003.

Opinion

Rita LANGENHORST, etc., respondent, v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, etc., et al., petitioners.

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Rita LANGENHORST, etc., respondent,
v.
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, etc., et al., petitioners.