Langemyr v. Campbell

27 A.D.2d 942, 279 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4422

This text of 27 A.D.2d 942 (Langemyr v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langemyr v. Campbell, 27 A.D.2d 942, 279 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4422 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1967).

Opinion

Two orders of the Supreme Court, Rock-land County, dated October 26, 1966 and October 31, 1966, respectively, the first dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action and the second confirming an arbitration award, affirmed, with one bill of costs. A respondent in an arbitration proceeding (here the appellant) who is under indictment with respect to the same subject matter as is involved in the proceeding is not entitled as a matter [943]*943of constitutional right under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States to an adjournment of the proceeding until the indictment is dismissed and until there is no possibility of another indictment. In this case, appellant suffered no penalty by reason of the denial of an adjournment. To the contrary, he was allowed to and did invoke the Fifth Amendment at the arbitration hearing, and thus compelled petitioner to make out its case with independent proof and without the assistance of appellant’s books and oral testimony. Spevack v. Klein (385 U. S. 511), wherein the penalty was disbarment, and Garrity v. New Jersey (385 U. S. 493), wherein the penalty was forfeiture of a position as police officer and a pension, do not apply to this case. The situation here is analogous to those in Heit & Weisenthal v. Licht (218 App. Div. 753) and Tobias v. North Amer. Importing Co. (133 Misc. 474, affd. 225 App. Div. 699), wherein the plaintiffs were granted pretrial examinations of the defendants despite the claim that such examinations might result in the defendants being compelled to incriminate themselves. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Brennan, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garrity v. New Jersey
385 U.S. 493 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Spevack v. Klein
385 U.S. 511 (Supreme Court, 1967)
Heit & Weisenthal, Inc. v. Gustave Light
218 A.D. 753 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1926)
Tobias v. North American Importing Co.
225 A.D. 699 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)
Tobias v. North American Importing Co.
133 Misc. 474 (New York Supreme Court, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
27 A.D.2d 942, 279 N.Y.S.2d 41, 1967 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langemyr-v-campbell-nyappdiv-1967.