Langellotti v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Langellotti v. City of New York

262 A.D. 1027, 30 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7097

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 6, 1941·Published

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying the motion of the impleaded defendant, appellant, Williams-Bauer Corporation, to vacate the order of impleader or, in the alternative, to dismiss the cross-complaint of defendant City of New York for legal insufficiency, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The contract is broad in scope and may include liability over on the part of the appellant. The determination of this question requires a trial. Appellant’s time to answer the cross-complaint is extended until ten days after the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, order denying the motion of the impleaded defendant, appellant, Williams-Bauer Corporation, to vacate the order of impleader or, in the alternative, to dismiss the cross-complaint of defendant City of New York for legal insufficiency, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The contract is broad in scope and may include liability over on the part of the appellant. The determination of this question requires a trial. Appellant’s time to answer the cross-complaint is extended until ten days after the entry of the order hereon. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Langellotti v. City of New York, 262 A.D. 1027, 30 N.Y.S.2d 353, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7097 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

262 A.D. 1027 (Langellotti v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.