Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Lange v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of Elections

Lange v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of Elections

23 N.E.3d 1193, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1450
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 28, 2015
Docket2014-1932
StatusPublished

This text of 23 N.E.3d 1193 (Lange v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of Elections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lange v. Trumbull Cty. Bd. of Elections, 23 N.E.3d 1193, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1450 (Ohio 2015).

Opinion

In Mandamus. On motion to dismiss. Motion granted. Cause dismissed. On relator’s motion for order. Motion denied. On respondents’ motion to strike or dismiss amended complaint. Motion denied.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Kennedy, and French, JJ., concur. O’Neill, J., would deny the motion to dismiss and grant an alternative writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 N.E.3d 1193, 141 Ohio St. 3d 1450, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lange-v-trumbull-cty-bd-of-elections-ohio-2015.