Lange v. Lange

Supreme Court of Florida

Lange v. Lange

380 So. 2d 1027, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4121

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJanuary 31, 1980

DocketNo. 54347

StatusPublished

This text of 380 So. 2d 1027 (Lange v. Lange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lange v. Lange, 380 So. 2d 1027, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4121 (Fla. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

OVERTON, Justice.

This case is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported at 357 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). The district court affirmed the trial court’s judgment of dissolution which had awarded to a mentally ill wife exclusive possession of the marital home based on this special circumstance and demonstrated need. We accepted-jurisdiction ¹ because the decision conflicts with Saviteer v. McAdoo, 310 So.2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). That conflict, however, has been resolved by our decisions in McDonald v. McDonald, 368 So.2d 1283 (Fla.1979), and Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So.2d 949 (Fla.1980), which expressly disapproved Saviteer. Conflict having been resolved, we deny certiorari.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OVERTON, Justice.

This case is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal reported at 357 So.2d 1035 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). The district court affirmed the trial court’s judgment of dissolution which had awarded to a mentally ill wife exclusive possession of the marital home based on this special circumstance and demonstrated need. We accepted-jurisdiction ¹ because the decision conflicts with Saviteer v. McAdoo, 310 So.2d 28 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975). That conflict, however, has been resolved by our decisions in McDonald v. McDonald, 368 So.2d 1283 (Fla.1979), and Duncan v. Duncan, 379 So.2d 949 (Fla.1980), which expressly disapproved Saviteer. Conflict having been resolved, we deny certiorari.

It is so ordered.

ENGLAND, C. J., and ADKINS, BOYD and SUNDBERG, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

380 So. 2d 1027, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lange-v-lange-fla-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack