Lange v. Kohne

12 S.C.L. 115
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided January 15, 1821·Published

Opinion

Mr. Justice Huger

delivered the opinion of the Court.

It is unnecessary to notice the different grounds for a ney trial in this case, as the motion in arrest of judgment must prevail. At common law, a chose in action is not assignable. By the statute of Ann and our act, notes, &c, payable in money, are assignable. The note in que-Mou, [116]*116however, is not payable in money, but in paper medium.-— That paper medium is not money, appears from the 8th and'10th sections of the Constitution of the United States, which declare that Congress shall coin money; and that no state shall coin money, emit bills of credit, or make any thing but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts. But the act creating a paper medium, does not pretend to give it the character of money, it only makes it a tender at the treasury.

The motion in arrest of judgment must therefore be granted.

Justices Nott, Colcock, Gantt, Richards (maná Bay, concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lange v. Kohne, 12 S.C.L. 115 (S.C. 1821).

12 S.C.L. 115 (Lange v. Kohne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.