Lange v. . Evans

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Lange v. . Evans

184 S.E. 467, 209 N.C. 747, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 342

DecidedMarch 18, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 184 S.E. 467 (Lange v. . Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lange v. . Evans, 184 S.E. 467, 209 N.C. 747, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 342 (N.C. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Pub Cubiam.

The plaintiff is the owner in fee of the premises described in the affidavit filed in this action. The defendant is in possession of said premises, claiming as a sublessee of the lessee of the plaintiff. At the date of the commencement of the action the sublease had not expired. However, prior to said date, the lessee of the plaintiff, under whom the defendant claims, had forfeited and surrendered all his rights under the original lease.

On these facts shown by all the evidence, there was no error in the trial. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pub Cubiam.

The plaintiff is the owner in fee of the premises described in the affidavit filed in this action. The defendant is in possession of said premises, claiming as a sublessee of the lessee of the plaintiff. At the date of the commencement of the action the sublease had not expired. However, prior to said date, the lessee of the plaintiff, under whom the defendant claims, had forfeited and surrendered all his rights under the original lease.

On these facts shown by all the evidence, there was no error in the trial. The judgment is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 S.E. 467, 209 N.C. 747, 1936 N.C. LEXIS 342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lange-v-evans-nc-1936.