Lange v. Devlin

156 P. 260, 80 Or. 238, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 19
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided March 21, 1916·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Mr. Justice Harris

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. The appellant used and dealt with the land as though it then intended fully to accept and accede to the terms of the decree, and it will not be permitted to change the position which it voluntarily assumed. Kellogg v. Smith, 70 Or. 449, 456 (142 Pac. 330), furnishes a conclusive precedent. See, also, Thomas v. Booth-Kelly Co., 52 Or. 534 (97 Pac. 1078, 132 Am. St. Rep. 713); Elwert v. Marley, 53 Or. 591 (99 Pac. 887, 101 Pac. 671, 133 Am. St. Rep. 850); 3 C. J. 665, 669.

The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal Dismissed. Rehearing Denied.

Mr. Chief Justice Moore, Mr. Justice Burnett and Mr. Justice Bean concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lange v. Devlin, 156 P. 260, 80 Or. 238, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 19 (Or. 1916).

156 P. 260 (Lange v. Devlin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schwager v. Christoffel
536 P.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1975)
In Re Guardianship of Styer
536 P.2d 717 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1975)
Miller Et Ux v. Barker Et Ux
377 P.2d 343 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1962)
Kelly v. Tracy
305 P.2d 411 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)
Isenhart v. Isenhart
296 P.2d 927 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1956)
Pacific General Contractors, Inc. v. Slate Construction Co.
251 P.2d 454 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1952)
Fluhrer v. Bramel
77 P.2d 824 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1938)