Lange v. Circuit Judge
This text of 1 McGrath 469 (Lange v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
To compel- vacation of order requiring respondent, in contempt proceedings, after answer upon oath filed, to answer interrogatories and permitting further proofs to be made respecting the matters set forth in the petition-upon which the order to show cause was issued.
Order to show cause denied June 26, 1894.
(For a full statement of the facts, see in re Lange, 104 M., 411.)
Relator insisted that his answer was final. U. S. vs. Dodge, 2 Gallison, U. S. C. C., 313; Ex Parte Briggs, 64 N. C., 214; Ex Parte Moore, 63 N. C., 397; In re Murdock, 2 Bland, 461; Hollingsworth vs. Duane, Wall., C. C., 77; Ex Parte Gould, 33 Pac. Rep. (Cal.), 1112; Langdon vs. Circuit Judge, 76 M., 358-366; Latimer vs. Barmore, 81 M., 592.
Respondent, in a brief anticipating the application, contended that. How. Stat. Sec. 7275, was applicable, Latimer vs. Barmore, 81 M., 592; that such is the practical construction which has been given to the statute, Scott vs. Layng, 59 M., 43; Smith vs. Circuit Judge, 84 M., 564 (475).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 McGrath 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lange-v-circuit-judge-mich-1894.