Langdon v. Stewart

8 N.E. 605, 142 Mass. 576, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 379
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided October 23, 1886·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Field, J.

The only material exception is to the ruling that the tax deed conveyed no title to the tenant. The Gen. Sts. c. 12, § 35, required that the deed “ shall state the cause of sale; ” and § 22 provided that taxes on real estate may be levied “ by sale thereof, if the tax is not paid within fourteen days after a demand of payment.” This deed recites that “ no person has appeared to discharge said tax; ” and that the collector “ has demanded the same of John J. Stewart, the reported owner of said real estate; ” but there is no statement that fourteen days elapsed after the demand before advertising the premises for sale, or that the tax was not paid within fourteen days after the demand. A demand made on the day of the sale would satisfy the recitals in the deed. The deed is therefore void. Harrington v. Worcester, 6 Allen, 576. Reed v. Crapo, 127 Mass. 39. Adams v. Mills, 126 Mass. 278.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langdon v. Stewart, 8 N.E. 605, 142 Mass. 576, 1886 Mass. LEXIS 379 (Mass. 1886).

8 N.E. 605 (Langdon v. Stewart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Conners v. City of Lowell
95 N.E. 412 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1911)
Charland v. Trustees of the Home for Aged Women
91 N.E. 146 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1910)
Downey v. Lancy
59 N.E. 1015 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Pixley v. Pixley
41 N.E. 648 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)