Langdon v. NISWONGER-LANGDON PAVING, INC.
This text of 235 S.W.3d 606 (Langdon v. NISWONGER-LANGDON PAVING, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Richard A. Langdon, Susan B. Langdon, and Langdon Contracting, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment awarding them less attorney’s fees and costs than they had requested. We find that the trial court did not err by failing to award Plaintiffs attorney’s fees and costs for their successful breach of employment agreement claim. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its determination of what constitutes a reasonable award of attorney’s fees and costs.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 S.W.3d 606, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1426, 2007 WL 2993913, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langdon-v-niswonger-langdon-paving-inc-moctapp-2007.