Langdon v. NISWONGER-LANGDON PAVING, INC.

235 S.W.3d 606, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1426, 2007 WL 2993913
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2007·No. ED 89469·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Richard A. Langdon, Susan B. Langdon, and Langdon Contracting, Inc. (“Plaintiffs”) appeal the judgment awarding them less attorney’s fees and costs than they had requested. We find that the trial court did not err by failing to award Plaintiffs attorney’s fees and costs for their successful breach of employment agreement claim. We also find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its determination of what constitutes a reasonable award of attorney’s fees and costs.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langdon v. NISWONGER-LANGDON PAVING, INC., 235 S.W.3d 606, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1426, 2007 WL 2993913 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

235 S.W.3d 606 (Langdon v. NISWONGER-LANGDON PAVING, INC.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trammel v. Bob Schultz Motors, Inc.
235 S.W.3d 606 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)