Home/New York Court of Appeals/Langdon v. Mayor, Aldermen Commonalty, N.Y.

Langdon v. Mayor, Aldermen Commonalty, N.Y.

31 N.E. 98, 133 N.Y. 628, 1892 N.Y. LEXIS 1413
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 24, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 31 N.E. 98 (Langdon v. Mayor, Aldermen Commonalty, N.Y.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langdon v. Mayor, Aldermen Commonalty, N.Y., 31 N.E. 98, 133 N.Y. 628, 1892 N.Y. LEXIS 1413 (N.Y. 1892).

Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 630

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 631

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 632

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 633

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 634

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 635

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 636

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 637

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 638

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 639 MAYNARD, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except PECKHAM, J., taking no part.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Honolulu Redevelopment Agency v. Pun Gun
426 P.2d 324 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 1967)
Game & Fish Commission v. Farmers Irrigation Co.
426 P.2d 562 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1967)
In re the Superintendent of Highways of Frankfort
193 Misc. 617 (New York County Courts, 1948)
Buena Vista Land & Development Co. v. Lucas
41 F.2d 131 (Ninth Circuit, 1930)
Slane v. Curtis
286 P. 372 (Wyoming Supreme Court, 1930)
Big Five Mining Co. v. Left Hand Ditch Co.
216 P. 719 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1923)
Matter of City of N.Y. (Piers Old Nos. 8-11)
126 N.E. 809 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)
In re Block Bounded By Avenue A and First Avenue, Fifty-Ninth and Sixtieth Streets
122 N.Y.S. 321 (New York Supreme Court, 1910)
Coate v. Memphis Railroad Terminal Co.
120 Tenn. 525 (Tennessee Supreme Court, 1908)
In re City of New York
124 A.D. 465 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1908)
Colton v. N. Y. Elevated Railroad
31 Abb. N. Cas. 269 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.E. 98, 133 N.Y. 628, 1892 N.Y. LEXIS 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langdon-v-mayor-aldermen-commonalty-ny-ny-1892.