Langdon v. Lawrence Park Realty Co.

98 A. 777, 254 Pa. 86, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 687
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 15, 1916
DocketAppeal, No. 131
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 98 A. 777 (Langdon v. Lawrence Park Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langdon v. Lawrence Park Realty Co., 98 A. 777, 254 Pa. 86, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 687 (Pa. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the following from the opinion of the court below directing it to be entered: “In our opinion, the contract itself makes Joseph J. Heilman an independent contractor. Defendant company, as owner, did nothing to change the relation established by said contract. Plaintiff had no contractual relations Avith the owner: therefore, his action, if maintainable, is against his employer. It follows that defendant’s point in bar should have been affirmed: hence, the rule should be made absolute.”

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sharkey v. Airco, Inc.
522 F. Supp. 646 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Brletich v. United States Steel Corp.
285 A.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.
189 A.2d 271 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Thomas v. Bache
38 A.2d 551 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 A. 777, 254 Pa. 86, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langdon-v-lawrence-park-realty-co-pa-1916.