Langdon v. Lawrence Park Realty Co.

98 A. 777, 254 Pa. 86, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 687
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided May 15, 1916·No. Appeal, No. 131·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This judgment is affirmed on the following from the opinion of the court below directing it to be entered: “In our opinion, the contract itself makes Joseph J. Heilman an independent contractor. Defendant company, as owner, did nothing to change the relation established by said contract. Plaintiff had no contractual relations Avith the owner: therefore, his action, if maintainable, is against his employer. It follows that defendant’s point in bar should have been affirmed: hence, the rule should be made absolute.”

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langdon v. Lawrence Park Realty Co., 98 A. 777, 254 Pa. 86, 1916 Pa. LEXIS 687 (Pa. 1916).

98 A. 777 (Langdon v. Lawrence Park Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sharkey v. Airco, Inc.
522 F. Supp. 646 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 1981)
Brletich v. United States Steel Corp.
285 A.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1971)
Hader v. Coplay Cement Mfg. Co.
189 A.2d 271 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1963)
Thomas v. Bache
38 A.2d 551 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1944)