Langdon v. Hadley

150 N.E. 793, 85 Ind. App. 515, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 172
Indiana Court of Appeals·Decided February 26, 1926·No. No. 12,559.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Dausman, J.

Roy Langdon, as guardian of William Langdon, filed in the trial court a complaint to set aside the marriage of his ward. It is averred in the complaint that the guardian was appointed June 25, 1924; that about ten months prior thereto, William Langdon was married to one Grace Hadley, now known as Grace Langdon; that at the time of the marriage, William Langdon, the plaintiff’s ward, was insane; and that therefore the marriage is void. The trial court sus *516 tained a demurrer to the complaint, and that ruling is the only error assigned.

The guardian has no authority to maintain the action. Pence v. Aughe, Gdn. (1885), 101 Ind. 317.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langdon v. Hadley, 150 N.E. 793, 85 Ind. App. 515, 1926 Ind. App. LEXIS 172 (Ind. Ct. App. 1926).

150 N.E. 793 (Langdon v. Hadley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related