Langdon v. Garner

Fourth Circuit

Langdon v. Garner

88 F. App'x 554

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 10, 2004·No. 03-1649·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Langdon appeals from the district court’s order imposing a prefiling *555 injunction. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Langdon v. Garner, Nos. CA-01-746-5-BO, CA-01-816-5-BO, CA-01-906-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2003). We grant Langdon’s motion to amend his informal brief, deny his motion for stay pending appeal, deny Langdon’s motions for an extension to file a response, for appointment of counsel and oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Christopher Langdon appeals from the district court’s order imposing a prefiling *555 injunction. Our review of the record discloses no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Langdon v. Garner, Nos. CA-01-746-5-BO, CA-01-816-5-BO, CA-01-906-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Apr. 17, 2003). We grant Langdon’s motion to amend his informal brief, deny his motion for stay pending appeal, deny Langdon’s motions for an extension to file a response, for appointment of counsel and oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Langdon v. Garner, 88 F. App'x 554 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

88 F. App'x 554 (Langdon v. Garner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.