Langberg v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.
92 A. 398, 85 N.J.L. 377, 56 Vroom 377, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 295
This text of 92 A. 398 (Langberg v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Langberg v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co., 92 A. 398, 85 N.J.L. 377, 56 Vroom 377, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 295 (N.J. 1913).
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion promulgated by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisch, Yrbdenburgh, Congdon, White, Tbrhunb, Heppenheimer, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
92 A. 398, 85 N.J.L. 377, 56 Vroom 377, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langberg-v-wilkinson-gaddis-co-nj-1913.