Langberg v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.
92 A. 398, 85 N.J.L. 377, 56 Vroom 377, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 295
Opinion
The judgment under review will be affirmed, for the reasons set forth in the opinion promulgated by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Bergen, Voorhees, Kalisch, Yrbdenburgh, Congdon, White, Tbrhunb, Heppenheimer, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Langberg v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co., 92 A. 398, 85 N.J.L. 377, 56 Vroom 377, 1913 N.J. LEXIS 295 (N.J. 1913).
92 A. 398 (Langberg v. Wilkinson, Gaddis & Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.