Langbein v. Schneider

16 N.Y.S. 943, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2306
New York District Court·Decided April 7, 1891·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

McKean, J.

This is rather a novel case, and there are evidently no reported cases in this state on the point involved. I have read over the evidence, together with the briefs and points of both counsel, very carefully. The law is no doubt well settled that a wife has an implied agency to bind her husband for her necessaries when he fails to supply them. The English cases cited uphold plaintiffs’ contention, and the two Georgia cases are strongly in their favor. I cannot well disregard them, and feel justified in following them. Under the evidence in this case I think the plaintiffs are ■entitled to judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Langbein v. Schneider, 16 N.Y.S. 943, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2306 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

16 N.Y.S. 943 (Langbein v. Schneider) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rogers v. Daniel
1923 OK 588 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Kiddle v. Kiddle
133 N.W. 181 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1911)
Zent v. Sullivan
91 P. 1088 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)
Wolcott v. Patterson
24 L.R.A. 629 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)