Langbein v. Schneider

16 N.Y.S. 943, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2306
CourtNew York District Court
DecidedApril 7, 1891
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 16 N.Y.S. 943 (Langbein v. Schneider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York District Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Langbein v. Schneider, 16 N.Y.S. 943, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2306 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Opinion

McKean, J.

This is rather a novel case, and there are evidently no reported cases in this state on the point involved. I have read over the evidence, together with the briefs and points of both counsel, very carefully. The law is no doubt well settled that a wife has an implied agency to bind her husband for her necessaries when he fails to supply them. The English cases cited uphold plaintiffs’ contention, and the two Georgia cases are strongly in their favor. I cannot well disregard them, and feel justified in following them. Under the evidence in this case I think the plaintiffs are ■entitled to judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rogers v. Daniel
1923 OK 588 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1923)
Kiddle v. Kiddle
133 N.W. 181 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1911)
Zent v. Sullivan
91 P. 1088 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)
Wolcott v. Patterson
24 L.R.A. 629 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
16 N.Y.S. 943, 1891 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2306, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langbein-v-schneider-nydistct-1891.