Langbein v. Gross

New York Court of Common Pleas

Langbein v. Gross

14 Abb. Pr. 412, 46 How. Pr. 50

DecidedSeptember 15, 1873

StatusPublished

This text of 14 Abb. Pr. 412 (Langbein v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Langbein v. Gross, 14 Abb. Pr. 412, 46 How. Pr. 50 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1873).

Pincite

Opinion

Daly (J. F.), J.

Held that section 416 of the Code required parties to file pleadings without notice, yet, in this case, notice to file had been given as a matter of courtesy, and the pleading not having been filed, and the adverse party being obliged to draw and' present an affidavit in proof of the omission, and to obtain an order to compel the filing, it was proper to insert ten dollars costs in the order for the trouble the party had been put to, and therefore denied the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Daly (J. F.), J.

Held that section 416 of the Code required parties to file pleadings without notice, yet, in this case, notice to file had been given as a matter of courtesy, and the pleading not having been filed, and the adverse party being obliged to draw and' present an affidavit in proof of the omission, and to obtain an order to compel the filing, it was proper to insert ten dollars costs in the order for the trouble the party had been put to, and therefore denied the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 Abb. Pr. 412, 46 How. Pr. 50, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langbein-v-gross-nyctcompl-1873.