Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.
This text of 48 F. App'x 4 (Langadinos v. American Airlines, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After carefully reviewing the briefs and record on appeal, we affirm substantially for the reasons given by the district court. Despite notice and without excuse, the appellant failed to carry out the court’s orders concerning discovery and sanctions. He also burdened the court and the appellee with needless delays. Robson v. Hollenbeck, 81 F.3d 1 (1st Cir.1996); United States v. One 1987 BMW, 985 F.2d 655, 657 (1st Cir.1993). The court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the action. Velazquez-Rivera v. Sea-Land Service, Inc., 920 F.2d 1072 (1st Cir.1990).
Affirmed. Loc. R. 27(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
48 F. App'x 4, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/langadinos-v-american-airlines-inc-ca1-2002.