Lang v. State

266 S.W.3d 331, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1394, 2008 WL 4553074
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 14, 2008·No. ED 90945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Thomas Lang appeals from the motion court’s judgment, after a hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang v. State, 266 S.W.3d 331, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1394, 2008 WL 4553074 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 331 (Lang v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Maxwell v. State
266 S.W.3d 331 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)