Lang v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lang v. State

266 S.W.3d 331, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1394, 2008 WL 4553074

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 14, 2008

DocketED 90945

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 266 S.W.3d 331 (Lang v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lang v. State, 266 S.W.3d 331, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1394, 2008 WL 4553074 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Thomas Lang appeals from the motion court’s judgment, after a hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant Thomas Lang appeals from the motion court’s judgment, after a hearing, denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and we conclude that the trial court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). No precedential or jurisprudential purpose would be served by an opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only, setting forth the reasons for this order. We affirm pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 S.W.3d 331, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1394, 2008 WL 4553074, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack