Lang v. State

941 So. 2d 528, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18908, 2006 WL 3207975
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lang v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 931 So. 2d 922
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 8, 2006·No. No. 1D05-3697·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant’s conviction for possession of a firearm by convicted felon and the overall sentence imposed are affirmed. However, because appellant was not charged with or proven to have been in actual possession of the firearm — as required by section 775.087(4), Florida Statutes (2005) — we reverse the three-year mandatory minimum sentence imposed pursuant to that statute, and remand with directions to strike that portion of the sentence. See Cook v. State, 816 So.2d 267 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002). Appellant need not be present for resentencing. See Irons v. State, 851 So.2d 798 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; and REMANDED, with directions.

BROWNING, C.J., DAVIS, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang v. State, 941 So. 2d 528, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 18908, 2006 WL 3207975 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

941 So. 2d 528 (Lang v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Irons v. State
851 So. 2d 798 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cook v. State
816 So. 2d 267 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)