Lang v. State

598 So. 2d 1081, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7037, 1992 WL 121386
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lang v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 566 So. 2d 1354
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 5, 1992·No. No. 92-01610·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James E. Lang appeals the denial of his motion to correct sentence in which he alleged that the trial court did not give him credit on his present sentences for gain time earned during a previous period of incarceration for the offenses. Although the trial court did order that Lang receive credit for time actually served, the court’s order failed to credit Lang with the gain time that he had earned. This was error. State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989) Accordingly, we reverse the denial of Lang’s motion and remand for further proceedings consistent with Green.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and CAMPBELL and PARKER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang v. State, 598 So. 2d 1081, 1992 Fla. App. LEXIS 7037, 1992 WL 121386 (Fla. Ct. App. 1992).

598 So. 2d 1081 (Lang v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Green
547 So. 2d 925 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1989)