Lang v. State

503 So. 2d 957, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 711, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12023
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lang v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Fla. L. Weekly 2267
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 5, 1987·No. No. BL-370·Published

Opinion

SMITH, Judge.

Appellant appeals his sentence, which departs from the sentencing guidelines, and the imposition of costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1985). Although the trial court’s reasons for departure were in narrative form, it is clear that the trial court departed for these two reasons: (1) appellant’s juvenile record which was not scored, and (2) the timing of appellant’s offenses. Both of these reasons are valid. Weems v. State, 469 So.2d 128 (Fla.1985); and Williams v. State, 484 So.2d 71 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). However, the imposition of costs is reversed since appellant was not given notice and an opportunity to object. Lawton v. State, 492 So.2d 404 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). See also Comer v. State, 502 So.2d 513 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), and Harris v. State, 498 So.2d 1371 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

REVERSED and REMANDED for re-, sentencing.

JOANOS and BARFIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang v. State, 503 So. 2d 957, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 711, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12023 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

503 So. 2d 957 (Lang v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lawton v. State
492 So. 2d 404 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Comer v. State
502 So. 2d 513 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Weems v. State
469 So. 2d 128 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Harris v. State
498 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)
Williams v. State
484 So. 2d 71 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)