Lang v. State
129 So. 312, 23 Ala. App. 576, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 182
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of the offense denounced by section 4912 of the Code of 1923, “buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property.”
There was no proof of the value of the property. This was fatal, to the judgment of conviction, and, as is made clear in the opinion in Booker v. State, 151 Ala. 97, 44 So. 56, because of this omission in the proof the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.
The other questions are simple, and will not likely arise on another trial.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lang v. State, 129 So. 312, 23 Ala. App. 576, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 182 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).
129 So. 312 (Lang v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
R.L.M. v. State
895 So. 2d 389 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)
Levert v. State
512 So. 2d 790 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Padgett v. State
216 So. 2d 187 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)
Curtis v. State
208 So. 2d 245 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)