Home/Alabama Court of Appeals/Lang v. State

Lang v. State

129 So. 312, 23 Ala. App. 576, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 182
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 24, 1930
Docket8 Div. 79.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 129 So. 312 (Lang v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lang v. State, 129 So. 312, 23 Ala. App. 576, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 182 (Ala. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

RICE, J.

Appellant was convicted of the offense denounced by section 4912 of the Code of 1923, “buying, receiving, concealing, etc., stolen property.”

There was no proof of the value of the property. This was fatal, to the judgment of conviction, and, as is made clear in the opinion in Booker v. State, 151 Ala. 97, 44 So. 56, because of this omission in the proof the judgment must be reversed and the cause remanded.

The other questions are simple, and will not likely arise on another trial.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

R.L.M. v. State
895 So. 2d 389 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2004)
Levert v. State
512 So. 2d 790 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1987)
Padgett v. State
216 So. 2d 187 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1968)
Curtis v. State
208 So. 2d 245 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
129 So. 312, 23 Ala. App. 576, 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 182, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-state-alactapp-1930.