Lang v. Shaw

65 S.E. 789, 6 Ga. App. 747, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 443
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 5, 1909
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 S.E. 789 (Lang v. Shaw) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lang v. Shaw, 65 S.E. 789, 6 Ga. App. 747, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 443 (Ga. Ct. App. 1909).

Opinion

Powell, J.

While ordinarily notes, checks, due-bills, and other similar instruments given to evidence an indebtedness are not payment until they themselves are paid, yet the contract between the parties may make them so. Where a creditor holding an indebtedness against a single debtor takes the joint due-hill of this debtor and a third person, with a recital therein that it is in' settlement of the account out of which the indebtedness arose, the creditor can not thereafter sue the original debtor upon the account. The taking of the due-bill under such circumstances amounts to a novation; and if both the joint makers are alive and within the jurisdiction of the court, they are subject to suit only in a joint action upon the due-bill. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Nash Motors Co. v. Harrison Co.
183 S.E. 202 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 S.E. 789, 6 Ga. App. 747, 1909 Ga. App. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-shaw-gactapp-1909.