Lang v. Montgomery

79 S.E. 840, 140 Ga. 690, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 223
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 14, 1913·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Hill, J.

1. “Where it appears that, the clerk of a trial court has failed to transmit to the Supreme Court, within the time prescribed by law, a bill of exceptions and transcript, and that the plaintiff in error or his attorney ‘has been the cause of the delay, . . by consent, direction, or procurement of any kind,’ the writ of error will be dismissed.” Wheeler v. Crawford, 135 Ga. 148 (69 S. E. 22) ; Wilson v. State, 124 Ga. 30 (52 S. E. 81) ; Budden v. Brooks, 123 Ga. 882 (51 S. E. 727); Civil Code, §§ 6185, 6186.

2. Accordingly, where a bill of exceptions was filed with the clerk of the trial court on October 11, 1912, but the bill of exceptions and transcript were not transmitted to the Supreme Court until November 13, 1912, because the plaintiff in error (who is also an attorney) held the papers in his office, as appears by the certificate of the clerk of the trial court, the bill of exceptions will be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang v. Montgomery, 79 S.E. 840, 140 Ga. 690, 1913 Ga. LEXIS 223 (Ga. 1913).

79 S.E. 840 (Lang v. Montgomery) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlanta & Lowry National Bank v. Goodwin
128 S.E. 691 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1925)
Hutto v. State
99 S.E. 710 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Nobles v. Smith
87 S.E. 606 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)
Smith v. Watson
80 S.E. 862 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1914)