Lang v. Mayor of Bayonne
This text of 62 A. 270 (Lang v. Mayor of Bayonne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
The relator was appointed as a patrolman on the police force of the city of Bayonne on July 3d, 1893, and served continuously as such until April 24th, 1905, when, after notice and a hearing, he was expelled by a resolution of the board of police commissioners of that city. His present application is for a mandamus requiring the mayor and chief [110]*110of police to assign him to duty as a patrolman on the police force of the city.
If the action of the board of commissioners by which the relator was expelled from the police force was as to him valid, Ms present application, of course, must fail. His contention is that Ms said expulsion was invalid for the reason that the act of the legislature (Pamph. L. 1905, ch. 76), under which the board of police commissioners was created, was unconstitutional.
This contention, if sound, avails the relator nothing. The board, at the time it directed his expulsion, was a de facto body exercising public functions under a color of right; hence its acts, so far as the relator is concerned, are valid. Mitchell v. Tolan, 4 Vroom 195, 201; Bownes v. Meehan, 16 Id. 189; Dugan v. Farrier, 18 Id. 383.
The rule to show cause will be discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 A. 270, 73 N.J.L. 109, 44 Vroom 109, 1905 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-mayor-of-bayonne-nj-1905.