Lang v. Lang

268 A.D. 788, 49 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3486
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 19, 1944
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 268 A.D. 788 (Lang v. Lang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lang v. Lang, 268 A.D. 788, 49 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

Opinion

In an action for absolute divorce, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint upon the merits, entered after a verdict in favor of the defendant on settled issues. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and a new trial granted. The conduct of the plaintiff was not a proper issue at the trial, and the several portions of testimony imputing misconduct to him should not have, been admitted. (Parsons v. Parsons, 191 App. Div. 545.) Furthermore, the verdict of the jury which was accepted by the Special Term is clearly against the weight of the evidence and the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial should have been granted. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Freidberg v. Freidberg
12 A.D.2d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
268 A.D. 788, 49 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-lang-nyappdiv-1944.