Lang v. Lang

268 A.D. 788, 49 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3486
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 19, 1944·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action for absolute divorce, plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of the defendant dismissing the complaint upon the merits, entered after a verdict in favor of the defendant on settled issues. Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and a new trial granted. The conduct of the plaintiff was not a proper issue at the trial, and the several portions of testimony imputing misconduct to him should not have, been admitted. (Parsons v. Parsons, 191 App. Div. 545.) Furthermore, the verdict of the jury which was accepted by the Special Term is clearly against the weight of the evidence and the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial should have been granted. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Cars-well, Adel and Aldrich, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang v. Lang, 268 A.D. 788, 49 N.Y.S.2d 29, 1944 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3486 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1944).

268 A.D. 788 (Lang v. Lang) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Freidberg v. Freidberg
12 A.D.2d 594 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)