Lang v. Kimball
This text of 15 La. 200 (Lang v. Kimball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action on a bill, or draft. The defendant pleaded prescription only. There was judgment against him for the amount of the draft, and he appealed.
His counsel complains, that the plea of prescription having been overruled, judgment was incorrectly given on the merits, and that he ought to have been permitted to answer.
The court, in our opinion, erred. Prescription is an exception which does not touch the merits of the cause. Code of Practice, 345.
It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be annulled and reversed, and that this case be remanded for further proceedings, according to law; the plaintiff and appellee paying the costs of the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
15 La. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-kimball-la-1840.