Lang v. Kimball

15 La. 200
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 1840
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 15 La. 200 (Lang v. Kimball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lang v. Kimball, 15 La. 200 (La. 1840).

Opinion

Martin, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action on a bill, or draft. The defendant pleaded prescription only. There was judgment against him for the amount of the draft, and he appealed.

His counsel complains, that the plea of prescription having been overruled, judgment was incorrectly given on the merits, and that he ought to have been permitted to answer.

The court, in our opinion, erred. Prescription is an exception which does not touch the merits of the cause. Code of Practice, 345.

It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the judgment of the District Court be annulled and reversed, and that this case be remanded for further proceedings, according to law; the plaintiff and appellee paying the costs of the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lamb v. General Film Co.
58 So. 867 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1912)
Fellman v. Royal Ins.
185 F. 689 (Fifth Circuit, 1911)
Lea v. Terry
20 La. 428 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1868)
Lejeune v. Hébert
6 Rob. 419 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1844)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 La. 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-kimball-la-1840.