Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc.

892 N.E.2d 452, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1425
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided August 19, 2008·No. 2007-1370·Published

Opinion

Jackson App. No. 06CA18, 2007-Ohio-3898. Sua sponte, this cause is no longer held for the decision in 2007-0288 and 2007-0410, Ahmad v. AK Steel Corp., Butler App. No. CA2006-04-089, 2006-Ohio-7031. The parties are to brief the following question certified by the court of appeals:

“Whether a violation of an administrative building code provision prohibits the application of the open and obvious doctrine and precludes summary judgment on a negligence claim?”

This cause remains consolidated with 2007-1222, Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc., Jackson App. No. 06CA18, 2007-Ohio-3898.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc., 892 N.E.2d 452, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1425 (Ohio 2008).

892 N.E.2d 452 (Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ahmad v. Ak Steel Corp., Unpublished Decision (12-28-2006)
2006 Ohio 7031 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2006)
Lang v. Holly Hill Motel, 06 Ca 18 (5-23-2007)
2007 Ohio 3898 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2007)