Lang v. French & Co.

48 A.D.2d 641, 368 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9630
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 22, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases

This text of 48 A.D.2d 641 (Lang v. French & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lang v. French & Co., 48 A.D.2d 641, 368 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9630 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Order entered in the Supreme Court, New York County, on February 26, 1974, denying defendant’s motion to vacate a default judgment and for leave to serve and file an answer to the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and motion granted, without costs or disbursements. This breach of contract action was commenced by service of a summons without complaint on the Secretary of State pursuant to section 306 of the Business Corporation Law. The summons was mailed by the Secretary to the defendant, care of a law office in New York City. It was returned with a notation "returned to writer, addressee unknown.” Thereafter a complaint was filed in court but not served upon the defendant which at all times had an office and was actively engaged in business in the City of New York. A default judgment was entered on October 15, 1973. On January 15, 1974 defendant was served with a levy on its property. This was defendant’s first notice of this lawsuit. Defendant promptly moved to vacate the default and for leave to serve an answer. It posted an undertaking more than sufficient to cover the amount of the default judgment. The courts’ general policy favors disposition of matters on the merits. It was an abuse of discretion and an unduly harsh penalty, under the facts herein, to deny vacatur of this unintentional default. (See CPLR 317, 5015, subd [a]; and Richards, Fagone & Assoc. v Center Stage Stores, 44 AD2d 857.) Concur—Murphy, J. P., Lupiano, Cap^zzoli, Nunez and Yesawich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Saccone v. Saber
23 Misc. 3d 823 (NYC Family Court, 2009)
Catarine v. Beth Israel Medical Center
290 A.D.2d 213 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Goldstein v. Fox
175 Misc. 2d 883 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1997)
Penn v. American Airlines, Inc.
192 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Bauer v. Claridge At Park Place, Inc.
181 A.D.2d 566 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1992)
Price v. Polisner
172 A.D.2d 422 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)
Elemery Corp. v. 773 Associates
168 A.D.2d 246 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Seijas v. Rawhide Ranch, Inc.
99 A.D.2d 739 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)
H.K.A. Realty Co. v. United Steel & Strip Corp.
88 A.D.2d 612 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Lirit Corp. v. S. H. Laufer Vision World, Inc.
84 A.D.2d 704 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. AtLantic Sandblasting Service, Inc.
58 A.D.2d 751 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)
Armstrong v. Smith
53 A.D.2d 752 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)
Brac Construction Corp. v. Di-Com Corp.
51 A.D.2d 740 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 A.D.2d 641, 368 N.Y.S.2d 25, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-french-co-nyappdiv-1975.