Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Lang v. Bush

Lang v. Bush

51 So. 3d 1254, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 234, 2011 WL 180376
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 21, 2011
DocketNo. 5D10-1533
StatusPublished

This text of 51 So. 3d 1254 (Lang v. Bush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lang v. Bush, 51 So. 3d 1254, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 234, 2011 WL 180376 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We deny the Petition for Certiorari. We conclude that the trial court applied the correct legal standard. See O’Neal v. Sun Bank, N.A., 754 So.2d 170, 172 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000) (Fifth Amendment may be invoked when deponent has “reasonable grounds to believe that direct answers to deposition or interrogatory would furnish a [1255]*1255link in the chain of evidence needed to prove a crime against him.”). Here, Petitioners have no reasonable apprehension of criminal prosecution because the federal statute is not applicable and the statute of limitations has run on the applicable state crime.

PETITION DENIED.

ORFINGER, TORPY and EVANDER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Neal v. Sun Bank, N.A.
754 So. 2d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 So. 3d 1254, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 234, 2011 WL 180376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-bush-fladistctapp-2011.