Lang v. Brooklyn City Railroad
161 N.E. 178, 247 N.Y. 551, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1146
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
*552 Concur: Crane, Andrews and O’Brien, JJ.; Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur upon the ground that the declaration of trust pleaded in the complaint does not create an interest in favor of the cestuis que trust in advance of recovery or collection by the trustee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lang v. Brooklyn City Railroad, 161 N.E. 178, 247 N.Y. 551, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1146 (N.Y. 1928).
161 N.E. 178 (Lang v. Brooklyn City Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Johanson Et Ux. v. Cudahy Packing Co.
115 P.2d 794 (Utah Supreme Court, 1941)
General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp., of Perth v. Zerbe Construction Co.
199 N.E. 89 (New York Court of Appeals, 1935)
In re Bovard
228 A.D. 263 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)