Lang v. Brooklyn City Railroad
This text of 161 N.E. 178 (Lang v. Brooklyn City Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order affirmed, with costs, question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.
*552 Concur: Crane, Andrews and O’Brien, JJ.; Cardozo, Ch. J., Pound, Lehman and Kellogg, JJ., concur upon the ground that the declaration of trust pleaded in the complaint does not create an interest in favor of the cestuis que trust in advance of recovery or collection by the trustee.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
161 N.E. 178, 247 N.Y. 551, 1928 N.Y. LEXIS 1146, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lang-v-brooklyn-city-railroad-ny-1928.