Lang, Fisher & Stashower Advertising, Inc. v. Collins

347 N.E.2d 538, 46 Ohio St. 2d 285, 75 Ohio Op. 2d 330, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 633
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 26, 1976·No. No. 75-1167·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The “60-day letter” or notice of intent to levy an assessment is not a final determination that Lang, Fisher & Stashower Advertising, Inc., is a vendor. Of course, the notice reflects the view held by the Tax Commissioner at that time that appellant was a vendor. However, the' notice is not a final determination by the commissioner. Until such time as the commissioner makes a. final determination, the initial determination expressed in the notice is subject to modification or review by him.

Since the notice is .not a final determination by the Tax Commissioner, the Board of Tax Appeals correctly found that it was without jurisdiction to consider the appeal. R. C. 5717.02'; Michelin Tire Corp. v. Kosydar (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 254, 313 N. E. 2d 394.

For the foregoing .reason, the' decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed. . .

Decision affirmed...

. O’Neinl, C. J., Herbert, Córrigán,'Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lang, Fisher & Stashower Advertising, Inc. v. Collins, 347 N.E.2d 538, 46 Ohio St. 2d 285, 75 Ohio Op. 2d 330, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 633 (Ohio 1976).

347 N.E.2d 538 (Lang, Fisher & Stashower Advertising, Inc. v. Collins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Fiber Systems, Inc. v. Levin
2010 Ohio 1468 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2010)
Turner Construction Co. v. Lindley
399 N.E.2d 1231 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1980)